On Missing the Mark
This post is not about breastfeeding or formula. And while I am absolutely qualified to talk about Nestle I will not. I have been in the breastfeeding space for more than a decade. And the long, dirty history of Nestle’s marketing practices, WHO violations and human-rights abuses are simply a factual prologue to the recent stir that the Nestle family blogger event has caused in the social media world.
There is enough Nestle talk out there. I choose not to recount the history or educate anyone. The facts are in the public domain and easy enough for anyone to access. Since yesterday’s powerful and well-written post by Annie @PHDinParenting the lines have been drawn and it is getting nasty. I have watched from the sidelines (OK I have not been totally silent) – we are all witnessing mommy bloggers out for blood and people are getting hurt.
To me this is a case study for poor planning, short-sighted thinking and other classic marketing errors. What is clear to me is that there was no strategic or top-level thinking applied to this horrific play for Moms on the part of Nestle. In fact, it smacks of lack of experience, lack of understanding and certainly lack of expertise. Nestle has undervalued women in the worst way. Can’t you just imagine the “big idea” meeting: so the idea is they will love us, ask no questions and go forth and re-build our image all for the low, low price of a hotel room, some meals and some swag.
So Nestle, as a woman who is always curious and is passionate about marketing to new mothers – I am dying to know — who the hell was in that room? Who sat around the big old Nestle table when you failed to consider the terms of engagement with these women you wanted to woo? Or when you decided to withhold key information from women on the off chance that they would not find out? The plan was what — these moms should be your advocate and not know of your true, controversial history? How about when they were left in a position to defend you against the endless attacks on twitter and on blogs – how were they to manage that Nestle, what was the plan?
In fact, what Nestle has done is continued their tradition interpreting/massaging facts to suit their objectives. Never mind who gets hurt in the way, right? There is no statute of limitations on the many blemishes on your corporate resume and now you have added a new abuse, abuse of women (and some men too from what I understand)– congratulations on that.
This is a stunning example of why those who are involved with marketing to/with women and in specific, social media need to have well grounded leader managing their strategy. Someone with experience needs to be in charge and minding the big picture. Without going into a high level of detail here (boring, for some) strategy is built from a clear and well – thought out assessment and analysis of a brand’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. Simple – marketing 101 stuff. Gunning to fast tactics cannot, will not advance a brand. In fact, ill-conceived programs such as Nestle Family have the makings of a perfect storm. And today has been just that…
Nestle has lost control of the conversation – in fact the conversation that is being had is not only off-message (one would assume ) but the defense of Nestle has been left in the hands of those least qualified to handle it — the bloggers who answered their call and came for a few days of fun. This is damaging to the brand on a profound level (obviously) and leaves these bloggers in an untenable position. Feeling loyal, under attack, not knowing facts, frankly over their heads and outside of any normal scope of engagement for an event like this.
So Nestle – one more question(as one known for asking so many probing, hard questions of my clients) – Now you have a war with your name on it – now what’s the plan?
September 30th, 2009 at 10:26 pm
I’m guessing they thought that they could invite some bloggers to talk about products without the weight of an entire company’s worldwide practices coming into play. I think the message of the people attacking the bloggers is getting lost due to the fact that they’re shouting at people who shouldn’t be held responsible for the issues you’re bringing up. Ah, but it’s so much easier to shout at the bloggers.
October 1st, 2009 at 12:38 am
[...] have written more about this, like Julia from Forty Weeks who wrote On missing the mark: To me this is a case study for poor planning, short-sighted thinking and other classic marketing [...]
October 1st, 2009 at 8:06 am
Thanks for this thoughtful post — your second to last paragraph really hits the nail on the head re: a major component of what bothers me about this whole situation. I’m seeing a lot of attendee tweets saying, “I’m just relating what was told” — which of course is all they can do at this point. It’s a horrible situation to be put in.
I was invited to this event and declined; yesterday I wrote about this situation on my personal blog: http://popdiscourse.com/2009/09/on-bloggers-breastfeeding-formula-morality-changenestle-family-event/
best, Christine
October 1st, 2009 at 9:08 am
Exaclty!!! Like Nestle or not, the issue here isn’t about the “blemishes on your corporate resume” and breastfeeding vs. formula; it’s about how they failed at the marketing aspect of this event. I was just watching the fray yesterday until I saw several tweets from attendees about how Nestle wanted to be part of the conversation on Social Media…and here they were NOT part of the conversation at all and allowing the bloggers to take the brunt of the attacks. The second they provided a hashtag (#nestlefamily) they are either directly or indirectly asking the attendees to tweet about the event. And by not being on Twitter themselves they created a huge storm and placed the unknowing bloggers right in the eye of that storm.
And I hate (HATE!) how some people are now saying that companies will re-think marketing to “mommybloggers” – this is in no way their doing…it’s was a failure of Nestle’s marketing strategy.
October 1st, 2009 at 11:45 am
The position the moms attending have been put in is well described. Big marketing blunder, let’s see how they attempt to recover.
October 1st, 2009 at 11:55 am
When social media comes into play, companies lose control of the message. Period.
Just like when your terrible movie comes out in the theater and twitter and facebook negativity kill it before the weekend is out.
If you’re a large company with skeletons in your closet, maybe a parent blogger junket is not the appropriate vehicle.
October 2nd, 2009 at 12:50 am
Excellent post. Clean your house before you invite people over, Nestle!
October 3rd, 2009 at 7:00 am
Nestlé has a history of events like this, with more conventional media at least. I came across this one due to the volume of traffic to Baby Milk Action sites from links posted on Twitter – thanks to everyone who did that.
Here is something about our experiences in the UK:
http://boycottnestle.blogspot.com/2008/04/nestle-uk-strategy.html
For answers to some of the questions raised on Twitter see:
http://boycottnestle.blogspot.com/2009/10/twitter-answers.html
October 3rd, 2009 at 11:58 am
[...] lay where. I took a hard look at Nestle as a case study in failed marketing to/with Moms (On Missing the Mark,) . @crunchygoddess took a long well considered look at the lessons of the Nestle Family tweetstorm. [...]
October 7th, 2009 at 8:06 am
The shocking thing to me is that Nestle and much of corporate America view women who write online (I’m trying to stop using the word ‘bloggers’) as not worthy of taking the time to truly understand their values and community AND that these women are bright, savvy and educated. It really isn’t rocket science to know that if you reach out in a constructive, engaging and honest way, you’re going to get a lot more in return, even if you have to disclose your mistakes.
As long as corporations try to use women online as merely an extension of their PR staff, they will continue to fail.